In other words, what defines a parent seems to have less to do with genetics and more to do with who performs the social role of mother and father Purdy, It does this by allowing scientists to remove or create new cells.
Hence, limiting access to certain types of assisted reproductive technologies to an otherwise infertile couple would not necessarily infringe on their negative right to procreate Courtwright and Doron, Cloning can help parents or couples, who are infertile or have lost their children, to get a child or a clone of their child.
They had these embryos tested, and genomes checked. A single woman may want to have a baby, and would rather clone herself instead of using donated sperm.
Summary Comment Most advocates of human cloning also advocate the genetic modification of the human species. Callahan argues that there is something intrinsically identity-depriving, and therefore dignity-depriving, in duplicating a genetic code.
Some argue that we could produce clones to provide "spare parts" for people who need transplants. A chemist, who was presenting her views in support of reproductive cloning, read a letter by a father grieving the death of his infant son.
It can help rejuvenate, reverse heart attacks, infertility, plastic, reconstructive and cosmetic surgery, and take away defective genes and many other important benefits. It would violate deeply and widely held convictions concerning human individuality and freedom, and could lead to a devaluation of clones in comparison with non-clones.
Even a Discovery Channel program, meant to educate its viewers on the nature of cloning, initially portrays a clone as nothing more than a duplicate of the original person. Also, this could be used to help parents whose child is sick to make a clone of that child and then use the cloned child to donate blood, skin cells, etc.
In other words, even granting that individuals have a positive right to procreate, it does not follow from this alone that they should be provided with any means necessary for successful procreation. Arguments in Favor of Reproductive Cloning 1.
Dolly, the famous cloned sheep, suffered from premature arthritis and progressive lung disease. Shaprio, James et al.
It Depends on Your Religion. Eleven days ago, as I awaited my turn to testify at a congressional hearing on human reproductive cloning, one of five scientists on the witness list took the microphone.
home page application page cloning page. Cloning humans - for and against. There are strong emotional reactions to cloning human beings, however there are also good arguments to be made both for and against cloning.
Arguments in Favor of Reproductive Cloning 1.
Reproductive cloning can provide genetically related children for people who cannot be helped by other fertility.
Moral Arguments in Favour of Human Cloning Dr.
Josephus J. Brimah School of Education Njala University Sierra Leone Abstract With the cloning of the sheep Dolly, arguments were made by so many scholars that the same technique of somatic nuclear cell transplant could be used to clone human persons.
This was vehemently opposed to on. Human cloning technology promises to cure many or all incurable diseases and the moral weight of the dying and infirm will undoubtedly sway the politicians more than the arguments of the healthy, who often remain ignorant of the potential of human cloning, because they have never been motivated by suffering to look desperately for a cure.
Will cloning, thus, compromise a child’s identity? Are such concerns grave enough to permanently ban reproductive cloning altogether? 4. Arguments in Favor of Reproductive Cloning and Responses a. Reproductive Liberty: The Only Way to Have a Genetically Related Child.
The Argument. the arguments in support of permitting human cloning, although with no implication that it is the stronger or weaker position.
Moral Arguments in Support of Human Cloning.An arguments in favor of cloning