And, since many drug users would no longer need to commit violent or property crime to pay for their habits, there would be fewer "real" criminals to house in the first place. Against Legalizing Drug Production and Distribution. The economic argument for drug legalization says: It is well recognised in developing countries, such as Kenya, that illicit alcohol production can result in the contamination with toxic by-products or adulterants that can kill or seriously affect the health of users.
Many high school students report that it is easier to obtain illegal drugs than alcohol and tobacco. Driving it underground makes any product, including drugs, more dangerous than it needs to be. The simple fun and euphoria attendant to drug use should count for permitting it.
The situation could be very much worse than I have suggested hitherto, however, if we legalized the consumption of drugs other than opiates.
There should be intelligent treatment of the incurables in outpatient clinics, hospitalization of those not too far gone to respond to therapeutic measures, and application of the prophylactic principles which medicine applies to all scourges of mankind.
As a result, while the health and safety risks of cigarettes may be greater than those proven to accompany marijuana, one can buy cigarettes from a vending machine and but go to prison for smoking marijuana.
In addition to standard philosophical objections to legal moralism, Husak contends that there is no good reason to think that recreational drug use is immoral.
Removing the drug inmates would leave 26, In fact, police persecution makes it imperative to move on, damn the customers. But so can aspirin, countless other over-the-counter drugs and common household items; yet the proven hazards of matches, modeling glue and lawn mowers are not used as reasons to make them all illegal.
Preface to World Drug Report Punishing persons by incarceration demands justification. Rare for any food, it is a good source of alpha-linolenic acidan omega 3 fatty acid which is deficient in most diets. Even many of the harmful physical effects of illicit drugs stem from their illegal status: Legalization would save tax money.
He also said that it could become a predatory body like the lobbying arms of the tobacco and alcohol industries.
Certainly not for those imprisoned. The same may be true of illicit drugs such as opiates, cocaine and amphetamine in developed societies.
According to the Federal Bureau of Prisons' Statistical Report, as of September 30 of that year federal institutions held 35, prisoners percent over the rated prison capacity of 25, That is why prudence is a political virtue: The murder rate in New York and the rate of drunken driving in Britain have not been reduced by a sudden upsurge in the love of humanity, but by the effective threat of punishment.
Our objection is not based upon pragmatic considerations or upon a head count: His position amounts to drug decriminalization with skepticism toward making drug production and sale illegal.
As a public health measure, statistics show that prohibition was a tremendous success. If one IV user has infected blood and some enters the needle as it is pulled out, the next user may shoot the infectious agent directly into his own bloodstream.
As long as customers know what they're getting and what it does, they can adjust their dosages to obtain the intended effect safely. There is no evidence of toxicity from contaminants of street heroin in Australia. And we even recognize the apparent paradox that some limitations to our freedoms have the consequence of making us freer overall.
In any case, there are reasons to doubt whether the crime rate would fall quite as dramatically as advocates of legalization have suggested. 10 Reasons to legalise all drugs comment from Transform: the campaign for effective drug policy 1 Address the real issues For too long policy makers have used prohibition as a smoke screen to avoid addressing the social and economic factors that lead people to use drugs.
Most illegal and legal drug use is recreational. Poverty and despair are. So the legalization of drugs cannot be supported by philosophical principle. But if the pragmatic argument in favor of legalization were strong enough, it might overwhelm other objections.
It is upon this argument that proponents of legalization rest the larger part of their case. Against Legalizing Drug Production and Distribution. Peter de Marneffe offers an argument against drug legalization. The argument itself is simple. If drugs are legalized, there will be more drug abuse.
If there is more drug abuse that is bad. Drug abuse is sufficiently bad to justify making drug production and distribution illegal. The economic argument for drug legalization says: legalize drugs, and generate tax income.
This argument is gaining favour, as national administrations seek new sources of revenue during the current economic crisis.
This legalize and tax argument is un-ethical and uneconomical. So the legalization of drugs cannot be supported by philosophical principle.
But if the pragmatic argument in favor of legalization were strong enough, it might overwhelm other objections. It is upon this argument that proponents of legalization rest the. identify the types of legal and illegal drugs that are commonly abused in the U.S.
today the types of drugs commonly abused in this country include controlled substances or those that fall into one of 5 schedules under the controlled substances act.An argument in favor of legalization of drugs